A collection of photographs in celebration of the vibrant and burgeoning red-trousered communities of London and elsewhere. Contributions gratefully received at lamfrt@gmail.com
From South Ken to Shoreditch, from Jermyn Street to Mare Street – these days anyone that’s anyone is wearing red trousers.
If you want your leg-coverings to let the world know that you’ve got a few quid and don’t care who knows it, or that you have some big ideas about what’s on at the ICA right now - or simply that you are completely insane (but in a mainly non-stabby way) - then you’d better get your wife or girlfriend to take those jeans and chinos down to the charity shop post-haste!
Because there’s only one type of trousers you’ll be wanting to wear, and that’s RED TROUSERS. In fact - if you can’t wear red trousers you’d be better off wearing NO TROUSERS AT ALL. That’s what I say.
Monday, 5 December 2011
Traveling trousers
A nice plush velvety corduroy offset by a solid tweedy coat. Also: trousers pleasingly a couple of inches too short.
(Although - and not wishing to be unkind here - I'm not sure the small-bag-over-shoulder look is quite the thing for a true Terracotta Warrior...)
A couple of inches too short? I think you need to get your eyes checked.
ReplyDeletehe is defiantly not terminal 5, therefore not flying BA, therefore a fraud?
ReplyDeleteThey are. Should fall on the shoe, just breaking the crease ( never crease jeans!)
ReplyDeleteIn full agreement with the above. These are definitely NOT 'a couple of inches too short'. Cords are supposed to be close-fitting, with little or no break around the ankles. In this case, then, I'd say this wearer has got them just about right.
ReplyDeleteI concur. Nice fit. terrible bag.
ReplyDeleteConcur on the very proper fit.
ReplyDeleteDon't know why everyone hates on the bag, though. In Manhattan we call it a canvas shopper, and it speaks pleasantly of a) yuppie sustainabilism and b) don't give a damn mentality.